Wispr Flow vs Udio
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffeb → #000000 Text
#1a1a1a → #f9f9f9 Brand
#f0d7ff → #e30b5d Border
#1a1a1a4d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
EB Garamond → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #ffffeb → #000000 ~
surface #034f46 → #0a0a0a ~
surface-soft #e4e4d0 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) ~
text #1a1a1a → #f9f9f9 ~
text-muted #666666 → #c2c2c2 ~
text-soft #888888 → #8a8a8a ~
brand #f0d7ff → #e30b5d ~
on-brand #1a1a1a → #ffffff ~
border #1a1a1a4d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #1a1a1a80 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) +
bg-alt #08080a +
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-faint #737373 +
brand-deep #c2094f +
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
link #f9f9f9 +
link-hover #e30b5d +
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
bg-dark #e4e4d0 −
text-darkest #111111 −
on-surface #ffffeb −
brand-ink #1a1a1a −
accent-glow #ffa946 −
accent-fathom #034f46 −
accent-pulse #7f1c34 −
border-soft #1a1a1a1a −
white #ffffff −
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) −
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) −
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) −
success #114e0b −
success-soft #cef5ca −
warning #5e5515 −
warning-soft #fcf8d8 −
danger #7f1c34 −
danger-soft #f8e4e4 −
focus-state #2d62ff typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Figtree","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.