Udio vs Wispr Flow
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #ffffeb Text
#f9f9f9 → #1a1a1a Brand
#e30b5d → #f0d7ff Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #1a1a1a4d Display font
InnovatorFont → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #000000 → #ffffeb ~
surface #0a0a0a → #034f46 ~
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) → #e4e4d0 ~
text #f9f9f9 → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #c2c2c2 → #666666 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #888888 ~
brand #e30b5d → #f0d7ff ~
on-brand #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #1a1a1a80 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
border-soft #1a1a1a1a +
white #ffffff +
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) +
success #114e0b +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning #5e5515 +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger #7f1c34 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-alt #08080a −
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-faint #737373 −
brand-deep #c2094f −
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
link #f9f9f9 −
link-hover #e30b5d −
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
disabled #737373 −
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) −
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) −
success-text #86efac −
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) −
warning-text #fcd34d −
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) −
danger-text #fca5a5 −
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
info-text #c2c2c2 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.