Diff

Wispr Flow vs Sourcegraph

53 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffeb #1a1817
Text
#1a1a1a #ededed
Brand
#f0d7ff #f34e3f
Border
#1a1a1a4d #34302d
Display font
EB Garamond PolySans
Body size
16px 16px
colors 48 changed
~ bg #ffffeb #1a1817
~ surface #034f46 #222222
~ surface-soft #e4e4d0 #1f1d1c
~ text #1a1a1a #ededed
~ text-muted #666666 #a0a0a0
~ text-soft #888888 #b8b8b8
~ brand #f0d7ff #f34e3f
~ on-brand #1a1a1a #ffffff
~ border #1a1a1a4d #34302d
~ border-soft #1a1a1a1a #2a2724
~ border-strong #1a1a1a80 #48433f
+ bg-soft #211f1d
+ bg-elev #252321
+ surface-strong #2c2a28
+ text-strong #ffffff
+ text-faint #7a7672
+ brand-hover #ff6354
+ brand-emphasis #d63b2d
+ brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12)
+ brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e
+ link #f34e3f
+ link-hover #ff6354
+ focus-ring #f34e3f
+ semantic-success #4ec77f
+ semantic-warning #e0a64b
+ semantic-danger #f34e3f
+ semantic-info #5aa9f0
+ diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14)
+ diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14)
+ shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55)
bg-dark #e4e4d0
text-darkest #111111
on-surface #ffffeb
brand-ink #1a1a1a
accent-glow #ffa946
accent-fathom #034f46
accent-pulse #7f1c34
white #ffffff
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05)
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10)
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50)
success #114e0b
success-soft #cef5ca
warning #5e5515
warning-soft #fcf8d8
danger #7f1c34
danger-soft #f8e4e4
focus-state #2d62ff
typography 4 changed
~ display {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} {"family":"PolySans","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} {"family":"PolySans","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} {"family":"PolySans","size":36}
~ body {"family":"Figtree","size":16} {"family":"PolySans","size":16}
radius 1 changed
~ card 12px 24px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Sourcegraph → Wispr Flow