Sourcegraph vs Wispr Flow
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #ffffeb Text
#ededed → #1a1a1a Brand
#f34e3f → #f0d7ff Border
#34302d → #1a1a1a4d Display font
PolySans → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #ffffeb ~
surface #222222 → #034f46 ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → #e4e4d0 ~
text #ededed → #1a1a1a ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #888888 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #666666 ~
brand #f34e3f → #f0d7ff ~
on-brand #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
border #34302d → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-soft #2a2724 → #1a1a1a1a ~
border-strong #48433f → #1a1a1a80 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
white #ffffff +
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) +
success #114e0b +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning #5e5515 +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger #7f1c34 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-faint #7a7672 −
brand-hover #ff6354 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
link #f34e3f −
link-hover #ff6354 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.