Wispr Flow vs Relume
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffeb → #f1f0ee Text
#1a1a1a → #161616 Brand
#f0d7ff → #161616 Border
#1a1a1a4d → rgba(22,22,22,0.12) Display font
EB Garamond → Relative Faux Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #ffffeb → #f1f0ee ~
bg-dark #e4e4d0 → #161616 ~
surface #034f46 → #ffffff ~
text #1a1a1a → #161616 ~
text-muted #666666 → #3e3e3e ~
text-soft #888888 → #6b6b6b ~
brand #f0d7ff → #161616 ~
on-brand #1a1a1a → #ffffff ~
border #1a1a1a4d → rgba(22,22,22,0.12) ~
border-soft #1a1a1a1a → rgba(22,22,22,0.06) ~
border-strong #1a1a1a80 → rgba(22,22,22,0.24) ~
success #114e0b → #1f7a4d ~
warning #5e5515 → #8a6d1f ~
danger #7f1c34 → #9a2a2a +
bg-soft #e9e8e5 +
bg-elev #f7f6f4 +
bg-dark-2 #222222 +
surface-2 #e9e8e5 +
surface-dark #222222 +
text-strong #000000 +
text-faint #9a9a9a +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
text-on-dark-muted #b8b8b8 +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
brand-hover #3e3e3e +
brand-active #000000 +
brand-soft rgba(22,22,22,0.06) +
border-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.14) +
success-bg #e3f0e9 +
warning-bg #f2ecd9 +
danger-bg #f2e0e0 +
info #161616 +
info-bg rgba(22,22,22,0.06) −
surface-soft #e4e4d0 −
text-darkest #111111 −
on-surface #ffffeb −
brand-ink #1a1a1a −
accent-glow #ffa946 −
accent-fathom #034f46 −
accent-pulse #7f1c34 −
white #ffffff −
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) −
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) −
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) −
success-soft #cef5ca −
warning-soft #fcf8d8 −
danger-soft #f8e4e4 −
focus-state #2d62ff typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} → {"family":"Relative Faux","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} → {"family":"Relative Faux","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} → {"family":"Relative Faux","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Figtree","size":16} → {"family":"Relative","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":14} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.