Tana vs Convex
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #f6eedb Text
#f0eded → #141414 Brand
#e1f0bd → #1a1a1a Border
#1f1f1f → rgba(20,20,20,0.12) Display font
tanaClassic → gtAmerica Body size
17px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #000000 → #f6eedb ~
surface #141414 → #1a1a1a ~
text #f0eded → #141414 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-muted #a8a5a3 → #555555 ~
text-faint #555250 → #6b6b6b ~
text-on-brand #000000 → #fdf4cc ~
brand #e1f0bd → #1a1a1a ~
brand-hover #cde0a3 → #292929 ~
link #e1f0bd → #141414 ~
link-hover #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
border #1f1f1f → rgba(20,20,20,0.12) ~
border-strong #2a2a2a → rgba(20,20,20,0.22) ~
focus-ring #e1f0bd → #1a1a1a ~
selection-bg #e1f0bd → #1a1a1a ~
selection-text #000000 → #fdf4cc ~
shadow rgba(0,0,0,0.6) → rgba(20,20,20,0.08) ~
success #a8d896 → #3f7d4e ~
warning #e6c07a → #b8860b ~
danger #e89a8d → #9b3232 ~
info #9bb8d4 → #3a5a8c ~
on-brand #000000 → #fdf4cc +
bg-alt #fbf7ec +
bg-warm #efe5cd +
surface-deep #141414 +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
accent #fdf4cc +
accent-soft #faecae +
on-white #292929 +
pill-white #ffffff +
fill-subtle rgba(0,0,0,0.05) +
fill-subtle-inv rgba(255,255,255,0.05) +
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.12) +
focus-ring-dark #fdf4cc −
bg-soft #0a0a0a −
bg-deep #050505 −
surface-raised #1a1a1a −
surface-overlay #1f1f1f −
surface-inverted #f0eded −
text-soft #7a7775 −
text-on-inverted #0a0a0a −
brand-active #b8cc88 −
brand-soft #1f2516 −
accent-italic #d4caa8 −
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a −
border-soft #161616 −
border-inverted #d8d5d3 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} → {"family":"gtAmerica","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} → {"family":"gtAmerica","size":42} ~
h2 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} → {"family":"gtAmerica","size":32} ~
body {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} → {"family":"gtAmerica","size":16} ~
label {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} → {"family":"GT America Mono","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.