Convex vs Tana
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f6eedb → #000000 Text
#141414 → #f0eded Brand
#1a1a1a → #e1f0bd Border
rgba(20,20,20,0.12) → #1f1f1f Display font
gtAmerica → tanaClassic Body size
16px → 17px colors 47 changed
~
bg #f6eedb → #000000 ~
surface #1a1a1a → #141414 ~
text #141414 → #f0eded ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #555555 → #a8a5a3 ~
text-faint #6b6b6b → #555250 ~
text-on-brand #fdf4cc → #000000 ~
brand #1a1a1a → #e1f0bd ~
brand-hover #292929 → #cde0a3 ~
border rgba(20,20,20,0.12) → #1f1f1f ~
border-strong rgba(20,20,20,0.22) → #2a2a2a ~
focus-ring #1a1a1a → #e1f0bd ~
selection-bg #1a1a1a → #e1f0bd ~
selection-text #fdf4cc → #000000 ~
shadow rgba(20,20,20,0.08) → rgba(0,0,0,0.6) ~
link #141414 → #e1f0bd ~
link-hover #1a1a1a → #ffffff ~
success #3f7d4e → #a8d896 ~
warning #b8860b → #e6c07a ~
danger #9b3232 → #e89a8d ~
info #3a5a8c → #9bb8d4 ~
on-brand #fdf4cc → #000000 +
bg-soft #0a0a0a +
bg-deep #050505 +
surface-raised #1a1a1a +
surface-overlay #1f1f1f +
surface-inverted #f0eded +
text-soft #7a7775 +
text-on-inverted #0a0a0a +
brand-active #b8cc88 +
brand-soft #1f2516 +
accent-italic #d4caa8 +
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a +
border-soft #161616 +
border-inverted #d8d5d3 −
bg-alt #fbf7ec −
bg-warm #efe5cd −
surface-deep #141414 −
text-on-dark #ffffff −
accent #fdf4cc −
accent-soft #faecae −
on-white #292929 −
pill-white #ffffff −
fill-subtle rgba(0,0,0,0.05) −
fill-subtle-inv rgba(255,255,255,0.05) −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.12) −
focus-ring-dark #fdf4cc typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"gtAmerica","size":72} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} ~
h1 {"family":"gtAmerica","size":42} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} ~
h2 {"family":"gtAmerica","size":32} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} ~
body {"family":"gtAmerica","size":16} → {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} ~
label {"family":"GT America Mono","size":13} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.