Sourcegraph vs Pika
51 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #fcfaf7 Text
#ededed → #0d0d0d Brand
#f34e3f → #ffd184 Border
#34302d → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) Display font
PolySans → telkaExtended Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #fcfaf7 ~
surface #222222 → #ffffff ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → #fbf7f0 ~
text #ededed → #0d0d0d ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #8a8a8a ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #5c5c5c ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #b8b8b8 ~
brand #f34e3f → #ffd184 ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #222222 ~
link #f34e3f → #0d0d0d ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #000000 ~
border #34302d → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) ~
border-strong #48433f → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.18) +
bg-alt #f5f1ea +
brand-deep #f5be63 +
ink-cta-bg #000000 +
ink-cta-text #ffffff +
dark-cta-bg #222222 +
selected-bg rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) +
disabled #b8b8b8 +
border-subtle rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.05) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #15803d +
warning-bg rgba(245, 190, 99, 0.20) +
warning-text #92600c +
danger-bg rgba(220, 38, 38, 0.10) +
danger-text #b91c1c +
info-bg rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.06) +
info-text #0d0d0d −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
brand-hover #ff6354 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
border-soft #2a2724 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"telkaExtended","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"telkaExtended","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"telkaExtended","size":32} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"telka","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.