Diff

Pika vs Sourcegraph

51 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#fcfaf7 #1a1817
Text
#0d0d0d #ededed
Brand
#ffd184 #f34e3f
Border
rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) #34302d
Display font
telkaExtended PolySans
Body size
16px 16px
colors 46 changed
~ bg #fcfaf7 #1a1817
~ surface #ffffff #222222
~ surface-soft #fbf7f0 #1f1d1c
~ text #0d0d0d #ededed
~ text-strong #000000 #ffffff
~ text-muted #5c5c5c #a0a0a0
~ text-soft #8a8a8a #b8b8b8
~ text-faint #b8b8b8 #7a7672
~ brand #ffd184 #f34e3f
~ brand-soft rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12)
~ on-brand #222222 #ffffff
~ link #0d0d0d #f34e3f
~ link-hover #000000 #ff6354
~ border rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) #34302d
~ border-strong rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.18) #48433f
+ bg-soft #211f1d
+ bg-elev #252321
+ surface-strong #2c2a28
+ brand-hover #ff6354
+ brand-emphasis #d63b2d
+ brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e
+ border-soft #2a2724
+ focus-ring #f34e3f
+ semantic-success #4ec77f
+ semantic-warning #e0a64b
+ semantic-danger #f34e3f
+ semantic-info #5aa9f0
+ diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14)
+ diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14)
+ shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55)
bg-alt #f5f1ea
brand-deep #f5be63
ink-cta-bg #000000
ink-cta-text #ffffff
dark-cta-bg #222222
selected-bg rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30)
disabled #b8b8b8
border-subtle rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.05)
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12)
success-text #15803d
warning-bg rgba(245, 190, 99, 0.20)
warning-text #92600c
danger-bg rgba(220, 38, 38, 0.10)
danger-text #b91c1c
info-bg rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.06)
info-text #0d0d0d
typography 4 changed
~ display {"family":"telkaExtended","size":80} {"family":"PolySans","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"telkaExtended","size":48} {"family":"PolySans","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"telkaExtended","size":32} {"family":"PolySans","size":36}
~ body {"family":"telka","size":16} {"family":"PolySans","size":16}
radius 1 changed
~ card 12px 24px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Sourcegraph → Pika