SAP vs Mux
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #e2e4dd Text
#1d2d3e → #000000 Brand
#0070f2 → #ff5d00 Border
#d8dee5 → #000000 Display font
72 → Rotonto Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #e2e4dd ~
surface #ffffff → #d4d6cf ~
surface-soft #f5f6f7 → #ecebe7 ~
brand #0070f2 → #ff5d00 ~
brand-hover #0040b0 → #e54e00 ~
brand-active #002a77 → #c54100 ~
brand-soft #ebf8ff → #ffe5d4 ~
text #1d2d3e → #000000 ~
text-strong #0a2540 → #000000 ~
text-faint #8b95a3 → #8a8a8a ~
text-on-dark #ffffff → #e2e4dd ~
on-brand #ffffff → #000000 ~
border #d8dee5 → #000000 ~
border-soft #eaecee → #a0a29a ~
link #0070f2 → #000000 ~
link-hover #0040b0 → #ff5d00 ~
success #36a41d → #00b364 ~
warning #e76500 → #ff8c00 ~
danger #d20a0a → #e6483d ~
info #0070f2 → #0066ff +
bg-paper #ffffff +
bg-dark #000000 +
bg-dark-soft #1a1a1a +
surface-strong #c8caBF +
surface-on-dark #1a1a1a +
text-body #1a1a1a +
text-muted #5a5a5a +
accent-blue #0066ff +
accent-green #00b364 +
border-on-dark #2a2a2a +
ring #ff5d00 −
bg-soft #f5f6f7 −
bg-section #eaecee −
bg-feature #1d2d3e −
bg-footer #1d2d3e −
bg-cool #ebf8ff −
surface-elev #ffffff −
brand-subtle #d1efff −
navy #1d2d3e −
navy-deep #0a2540 −
text-soft #556270 −
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) −
border-strong #a8b1bd −
link-visited #5d36ff −
success-soft #e9f8ec −
warning-soft #fff3e0 −
danger-soft #fde1e1 −
info-soft #ebf8ff −
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) −
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) −
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"72","size":72} → {"family":"Rotonto","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"72","size":44} → {"family":"Rotonto","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"72","size":36} → {"family":"Rotonto","size":32} ~
body {"family":"72","size":16} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":16} ~
label {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} → {"family":"JetBrainsMono","size":11} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 3 changed
~
md 16px → 24px ~
lg 32px → 64px ~
xl 48px → 128px