Mux vs SAP
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#e2e4dd → #ffffff Text
#000000 → #1d2d3e Brand
#ff5d00 → #0070f2 Border
#000000 → #d8dee5 Display font
Rotonto → 72 Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #e2e4dd → #ffffff ~
surface #d4d6cf → #ffffff ~
surface-soft #ecebe7 → #f5f6f7 ~
text #000000 → #1d2d3e ~
text-strong #000000 → #0a2540 ~
text-faint #8a8a8a → #8b95a3 ~
text-on-dark #e2e4dd → #ffffff ~
brand #ff5d00 → #0070f2 ~
brand-hover #e54e00 → #0040b0 ~
brand-active #c54100 → #002a77 ~
brand-soft #ffe5d4 → #ebf8ff ~
on-brand #000000 → #ffffff ~
border #000000 → #d8dee5 ~
border-soft #a0a29a → #eaecee ~
link #000000 → #0070f2 ~
link-hover #ff5d00 → #0040b0 ~
success #00b364 → #36a41d ~
warning #ff8c00 → #e76500 ~
danger #e6483d → #d20a0a ~
info #0066ff → #0070f2 +
bg-soft #f5f6f7 +
bg-section #eaecee +
bg-feature #1d2d3e +
bg-footer #1d2d3e +
bg-cool #ebf8ff +
surface-elev #ffffff +
brand-subtle #d1efff +
navy #1d2d3e +
navy-deep #0a2540 +
text-soft #556270 +
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) +
border-strong #a8b1bd +
link-visited #5d36ff +
success-soft #e9f8ec +
warning-soft #fff3e0 +
danger-soft #fde1e1 +
info-soft #ebf8ff +
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) +
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) +
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) −
bg-paper #ffffff −
bg-dark #000000 −
bg-dark-soft #1a1a1a −
surface-strong #c8caBF −
surface-on-dark #1a1a1a −
text-body #1a1a1a −
text-muted #5a5a5a −
accent-blue #0066ff −
accent-green #00b364 −
border-on-dark #2a2a2a −
ring #ff5d00 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Rotonto","size":72} → {"family":"72","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Rotonto","size":40} → {"family":"72","size":44} ~
h2 {"family":"Rotonto","size":32} → {"family":"72","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Aeonik","size":16} → {"family":"72","size":16} ~
label {"family":"JetBrainsMono","size":11} → {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 3 changed
~
md 24px → 16px ~
lg 64px → 32px ~
xl 128px → 48px