Recraft vs Obsidian
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0f0f0f Text
#ffffff → #eeeeee Brand
#d2fc31 → #7c3aed Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #2a2a2a Display font
ABC Gravity Condensed → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0f0f0f ~
surface #141414 → #161616 ~
text #ffffff → #eeeeee ~
text-faint #525252 → #737373 ~
brand #d2fc31 → #7c3aed ~
brand-soft rgba(210, 252, 49, 0.14) → #2a1a4a ~
on-brand #0000ee → #ffffff ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #2a2a2a ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #3a3a3a +
bg-deep #0a0a0a +
surface-elev #1f1f1f +
surface-hover #262626 +
text-secondary #b0b0b0 +
brand-hover #6d28d9 +
brand-active #5b21b6 +
brand-text #a78bfa +
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd +
border-soft #1f1f1f +
border-brand #7c3aed +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
success #4ade80 +
success-soft #14321f +
warning #fbbf24 +
warning-soft #33270a +
danger #f87171 +
danger-soft #3a1717 +
info #a78bfa −
bg-alt #0a0a0a −
surface-soft #1c1c1c −
surface-elevated #242424 −
text-soft #737373 −
brand-deep #bce815 −
on-brand-ink #000000 −
link #ffffff −
link-hover #d2fc31 −
cta-secondary-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9) −
cta-secondary-text #0000ee −
selected-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
disabled #525252 −
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
border-lime rgba(210, 252, 49, 0.45) −
success-bg rgba(74, 222, 128, 0.12) −
success-text #86efac −
warning-bg rgba(250, 204, 21, 0.12) −
warning-text #fde047 −
danger-bg rgba(248, 113, 113, 0.12) −
danger-text #fca5a5 −
info-bg rgba(210, 252, 49, 0.10) −
info-text #d2fc31 typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"ABC Gravity Condensed","size":80} → {"family":"Inter","size":60} ~
h1 {"family":"ABC Gravity Condensed","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"ABC Gravity Condensed","size":32} → {"family":"Inter","size":32} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.