Obsidian vs Recraft
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #000000 Text
#eeeeee → #ffffff Brand
#7c3aed → #d2fc31 Border
#2a2a2a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Inter → ABC Gravity Condensed Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #000000 ~
surface #161616 → #141414 ~
text #eeeeee → #ffffff ~
text-faint #737373 → #525252 ~
brand #7c3aed → #d2fc31 ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(210, 252, 49, 0.14) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #0000ee ~
border #2a2a2a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) +
bg-alt #0a0a0a +
surface-soft #1c1c1c +
surface-elevated #242424 +
text-soft #737373 +
brand-deep #bce815 +
on-brand-ink #000000 +
link #ffffff +
link-hover #d2fc31 +
cta-secondary-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9) +
cta-secondary-text #0000ee +
selected-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
disabled #525252 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-lime rgba(210, 252, 49, 0.45) +
success-bg rgba(74, 222, 128, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(250, 204, 21, 0.12) +
warning-text #fde047 +
danger-bg rgba(248, 113, 113, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(210, 252, 49, 0.10) +
info-text #d2fc31 −
bg-deep #0a0a0a −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-secondary #b0b0b0 −
brand-hover #6d28d9 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
border-soft #1f1f1f −
border-brand #7c3aed −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
success #4ade80 −
success-soft #14321f −
warning #fbbf24 −
warning-soft #33270a −
danger #f87171 −
danger-soft #3a1717 −
info #a78bfa typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"ABC Gravity Condensed","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"ABC Gravity Condensed","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"ABC Gravity Condensed","size":32} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.