Pika vs Wispr Flow
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fcfaf7 → #ffffeb Text
#0d0d0d → #1a1a1a Brand
#ffd184 → #f0d7ff Border
rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) → #1a1a1a4d Display font
telkaExtended → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #fcfaf7 → #ffffeb ~
surface #ffffff → #034f46 ~
surface-soft #fbf7f0 → #e4e4d0 ~
text #0d0d0d → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #5c5c5c → #666666 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #888888 ~
brand #ffd184 → #f0d7ff ~
on-brand #222222 → #1a1a1a ~
border rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-strong rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.18) → #1a1a1a80 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
border-soft #1a1a1a1a +
white #ffffff +
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) +
success #114e0b +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning #5e5515 +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger #7f1c34 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-alt #f5f1ea −
text-strong #000000 −
text-faint #b8b8b8 −
brand-deep #f5be63 −
brand-soft rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) −
ink-cta-bg #000000 −
ink-cta-text #ffffff −
dark-cta-bg #222222 −
link #0d0d0d −
link-hover #000000 −
selected-bg rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) −
disabled #b8b8b8 −
border-subtle rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.05) −
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) −
success-text #15803d −
warning-bg rgba(245, 190, 99, 0.20) −
warning-text #92600c −
danger-bg rgba(220, 38, 38, 0.10) −
danger-text #b91c1c −
info-bg rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.06) −
info-text #0d0d0d typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"telkaExtended","size":80} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"telkaExtended","size":48} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"telkaExtended","size":32} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"telka","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.