Zed vs Wispr Flow
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f5f5f3 → #ffffeb Text
#393d45 → #1a1a1a Brand
#004edb → #f0d7ff Border
#e2e2de → #1a1a1a4d Display font
IBM Plex Serif → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 51 changed
~
bg #f5f5f3 → #ffffeb ~
text #393d45 → #1a1a1a ~
brand #004edb → #f0d7ff ~
on-brand #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
border #e2e2de → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-strong #d4d4ce → #1a1a1a80 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
surface #034f46 +
surface-soft #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
text-muted #666666 +
text-soft #888888 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
border-soft #1a1a1a1a +
white #ffffff +
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) +
success #114e0b +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning #5e5515 +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger #7f1c34 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-100 #ffffff −
bg-200 #eeede9 −
bg-300 #e7e6e1 −
surface-card #ffffff −
surface-code #1a1b1e −
text-200 #5a5e66 −
text-300 #6b6f78 −
text-400 #86888f −
text-strong #16181d −
brand-hover #003fb5 −
brand-soft rgba(0,78,219,0.08) −
cta-secondary-bg #ffffff −
cta-secondary-text #16181d −
link #004edb −
link-hover #003fb5 −
border-focus #004edb −
code-bg #1a1b1e −
code-text #e6e6e3 −
semantic-success #2e7d32 −
semantic-warning #b54708 −
semantic-danger #c01919 −
semantic-info #004edb typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"writer","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} ~
label {"family":"writer-mono","size":13} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius 2 changed
~
button 6px → 8px ~
card 8px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.