Zed vs IBM
62 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f5f5f3 → #ffffff Text
#393d45 → #161616 Brand
#004edb → #0f62fe Border
#e2e2de → #e0e0e0 Display font
IBM Plex Serif → IBM Plex Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #f5f5f3 → #ffffff ~
text #393d45 → #161616 ~
text-strong #16181d → #161616 ~
brand #004edb → #0f62fe ~
brand-hover #003fb5 → #0050e6 ~
link #004edb → #0f62fe ~
link-hover #003fb5 → #0043ce ~
border #e2e2de → #e0e0e0 ~
border-strong #d4d4ce → #161616 +
surface #ffffff +
surface-soft #f4f4f4 +
surface-strong #e0e0e0 +
surface-dark #161616 +
surface-dark-elev #262626 +
text-body #161616 +
text-muted #525252 +
text-soft #8c8c8c +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
text-on-dark-mute #c6c6c6 +
brand-active #002d9c +
brand-deep #0043ce +
border-on-dark #5e5e5e +
focus #0f62fe +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.5) +
success #24a148 +
success-soft #defbe6 +
warning #f1c21b +
warning-soft #fcf4d6 +
danger #da1e28 +
danger-soft #fff1f1 +
info #0f62fe +
info-soft #edf5ff +
cool-gray-bg #f2f4f8 +
hero-blue-tint #e8eaff −
bg-100 #ffffff −
bg-200 #eeede9 −
bg-300 #e7e6e1 −
surface-card #ffffff −
surface-code #1a1b1e −
text-200 #5a5e66 −
text-300 #6b6f78 −
text-400 #86888f −
brand-soft rgba(0,78,219,0.08) −
cta-secondary-bg #ffffff −
cta-secondary-text #16181d −
border-focus #004edb −
code-bg #1a1b1e −
code-text #e6e6e3 −
semantic-success #2e7d32 −
semantic-warning #b54708 −
semantic-danger #c01919 −
semantic-info #004edb typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"writer","size":16} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"writer-mono","size":13} → {"family":"IBM Plex Mono","size":11} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
lg 32px → 48px ~
xl 64px → 96px