Diff

IBM vs Zed

62 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #f5f5f3
Text
#161616 #393d45
Brand
#0f62fe #004edb
Border
#e0e0e0 #e2e2de
Display font
IBM Plex Sans IBM Plex Serif
Body size
16px 16px
colors 52 changed
~ bg #ffffff #f5f5f3
~ text #161616 #393d45
~ text-strong #161616 #16181d
~ brand #0f62fe #004edb
~ brand-hover #0050e6 #003fb5
~ border #e0e0e0 #e2e2de
~ border-strong #161616 #d4d4ce
~ link #0f62fe #004edb
~ link-hover #0043ce #003fb5
+ bg-100 #ffffff
+ bg-200 #eeede9
+ bg-300 #e7e6e1
+ surface-card #ffffff
+ surface-code #1a1b1e
+ text-200 #5a5e66
+ text-300 #6b6f78
+ text-400 #86888f
+ brand-soft rgba(0,78,219,0.08)
+ cta-secondary-bg #ffffff
+ cta-secondary-text #16181d
+ border-focus #004edb
+ code-bg #1a1b1e
+ code-text #e6e6e3
+ semantic-success #2e7d32
+ semantic-warning #b54708
+ semantic-danger #c01919
+ semantic-info #004edb
surface #ffffff
surface-soft #f4f4f4
surface-strong #e0e0e0
surface-dark #161616
surface-dark-elev #262626
text-body #161616
text-muted #525252
text-soft #8c8c8c
text-on-dark #ffffff
text-on-dark-mute #c6c6c6
brand-active #002d9c
brand-deep #0043ce
border-on-dark #5e5e5e
focus #0f62fe
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.5)
success #24a148
success-soft #defbe6
warning #f1c21b
warning-soft #fcf4d6
danger #da1e28
danger-soft #fff1f1
info #0f62fe
info-soft #edf5ff
cool-gray-bg #f2f4f8
hero-blue-tint #e8eaff
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":72} {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72}
~ h1 {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":40} {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":32} {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36}
~ body {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":16} {"family":"writer","size":16}
~ label {"family":"IBM Plex Mono","size":11} {"family":"writer-mono","size":13}
radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~ xs 4px 0px
~ sm 8px 4px
~ md 16px 12px
~ lg 48px 32px
~ xl 96px 64px
↻ Swap direction · Zed → IBM