Zed vs Accenture
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f5f5f3 → #0a0a0a Text
#393d45 → #ffffff Brand
#004edb → #a600ff Border
#e2e2de → #2e2e2e Display font
IBM Plex Serif → Graphik Body size
16px → 16px colors 51 changed
~
bg #f5f5f3 → #0a0a0a ~
text #393d45 → #ffffff ~
text-strong #16181d → #ffffff ~
brand #004edb → #a600ff ~
brand-soft rgba(0,78,219,0.08) → rgba(166,0,255,0.12) ~
link #004edb → #ffffff ~
link-hover #003fb5 → #a600ff ~
border #e2e2de → #2e2e2e ~
border-strong #d4d4ce → #4d4d4d +
bg-pure #000000 +
surface #141414 +
surface-soft #1c1c1c +
surface-strong #262626 +
surface-light #ffffff +
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 +
text-body #e6e6e6 +
text-muted #a3a3a3 +
text-soft #6b6b6b +
text-on-light #0a0a0a +
text-on-light-mute #525252 +
brand-bright #be4bff +
brand-deep #7d00c4 +
border-on-light #e0e0e0 +
focus #a600ff +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) +
success #3ad29f +
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) +
warning #ffb800 +
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) +
danger #ff5252 +
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) +
info #a600ff +
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) −
bg-100 #ffffff −
bg-200 #eeede9 −
bg-300 #e7e6e1 −
surface-card #ffffff −
surface-code #1a1b1e −
text-200 #5a5e66 −
text-300 #6b6f78 −
text-400 #86888f −
brand-hover #003fb5 −
cta-secondary-bg #ffffff −
cta-secondary-text #16181d −
border-focus #004edb −
code-bg #1a1b1e −
code-text #e6e6e3 −
semantic-success #2e7d32 −
semantic-warning #b54708 −
semantic-danger #c01919 −
semantic-info #004edb typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72} → {"family":"Graphik","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48} → {"family":"Graphik","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36} → {"family":"Graphik","size":32} ~
body {"family":"writer","size":16} → {"family":"Graphik","size":16} ~
label {"family":"writer-mono","size":13} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius 2 changed
~
button 6px → 8px ~
card 8px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.