Diff

Accenture vs Zed

58 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#0a0a0a #f5f5f3
Text
#ffffff #393d45
Brand
#a600ff #004edb
Border
#2e2e2e #e2e2de
Display font
Graphik IBM Plex Serif
Body size
16px 16px
colors 51 changed
~ bg #0a0a0a #f5f5f3
~ text #ffffff #393d45
~ text-strong #ffffff #16181d
~ brand #a600ff #004edb
~ brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) rgba(0,78,219,0.08)
~ border #2e2e2e #e2e2de
~ border-strong #4d4d4d #d4d4ce
~ link #ffffff #004edb
~ link-hover #a600ff #003fb5
+ bg-100 #ffffff
+ bg-200 #eeede9
+ bg-300 #e7e6e1
+ surface-card #ffffff
+ surface-code #1a1b1e
+ text-200 #5a5e66
+ text-300 #6b6f78
+ text-400 #86888f
+ brand-hover #003fb5
+ cta-secondary-bg #ffffff
+ cta-secondary-text #16181d
+ border-focus #004edb
+ code-bg #1a1b1e
+ code-text #e6e6e3
+ semantic-success #2e7d32
+ semantic-warning #b54708
+ semantic-danger #c01919
+ semantic-info #004edb
bg-pure #000000
surface #141414
surface-soft #1c1c1c
surface-strong #262626
surface-light #ffffff
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2
text-body #e6e6e6
text-muted #a3a3a3
text-soft #6b6b6b
text-on-light #0a0a0a
text-on-light-mute #525252
brand-bright #be4bff
brand-deep #7d00c4
border-on-light #e0e0e0
focus #a600ff
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7)
success #3ad29f
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14)
warning #ffb800
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14)
danger #ff5252
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14)
info #a600ff
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12)
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"Graphik","size":80} {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72}
~ h1 {"family":"Graphik","size":40} {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"Graphik","size":32} {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36}
~ body {"family":"Graphik","size":16} {"family":"writer","size":16}
~ label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} {"family":"writer-mono","size":13}
radius 2 changed
~ button 8px 6px
~ card 12px 8px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Zed → Accenture