Wispr Flow vs Brilliant
56 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffeb → #0c0e16 Text
#1a1a1a → #ffffff Brand
#f0d7ff → #fc6e51 Border
#1a1a1a4d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) Display font
EB Garamond → Brilliant Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #ffffeb → #0c0e16 ~
surface #034f46 → #13151f ~
text #1a1a1a → #ffffff ~
text-muted #666666 → #a8acba ~
text-soft #888888 → #7a7e8c ~
brand #f0d7ff → #fc6e51 ~
on-brand #1a1a1a → #ffffff ~
border #1a1a1a4d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
border-strong #1a1a1a80 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) ~
success #114e0b → #5ac38a ~
warning #5e5515 → #ffd44d ~
danger #7f1c34 → #ff5a6d +
bg-deep #06070d +
bg-section #13151f +
bg-elev #1c1f2c +
surface-strong #1f2230 +
brand-hover #ff8268 +
brand-pressed #e25738 +
brand-deep #b8401f +
brand-tint rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-faint #5a5e6c +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
link #fc6e51 +
link-hover #ffffff +
selected-bg rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) +
border-brand #fc6e51 +
diagram-coral #fc6e51 +
diagram-yellow #ffd44d +
diagram-cyan #5ac3e5 +
diagram-purple #b582ff +
info #5ac3e5 −
bg-dark #e4e4d0 −
surface-soft #e4e4d0 −
text-darkest #111111 −
on-surface #ffffeb −
brand-ink #1a1a1a −
accent-glow #ffa946 −
accent-fathom #034f46 −
accent-pulse #7f1c34 −
border-soft #1a1a1a1a −
white #ffffff −
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) −
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) −
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) −
success-soft #cef5ca −
warning-soft #fcf8d8 −
danger-soft #f8e4e4 −
focus-state #2d62ff typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Figtree","size":16} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 2 changed
~
lg 32px → 24px ~
xl 64px → 40px