WHOOP vs Wispr Flow
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #ffffeb Text
#ffffff → #1a1a1a Brand
#a0d10b → #f0d7ff Border
#1f1f1f → #1a1a1a4d Display font
Inter → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 51 changed
~
bg #000000 → #ffffeb ~
surface #0a0a0a → #034f46 ~
surface-soft #141414 → #e4e4d0 ~
brand #a0d10b → #f0d7ff ~
text #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #b5b5b5 → #666666 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #888888 ~
border #1f1f1f → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-soft #141414 → #1a1a1a1a ~
border-strong #2e2e2e → #1a1a1a80 ~
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.85) → rgba(17,17,10,0.50) ~
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.6) → rgba(26,26,15,0.05) ~
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.8) → rgba(26,26,15,0.10) ~
success #16ec06 → #114e0b ~
warning #ffde00 → #5e5515 ~
danger #ff0026 → #7f1c34 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
on-brand #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
white #ffffff +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-elev #0a0a0a −
bg-elev-strong #141414 −
bg-light #ffffff −
surface-strong #1f1f1f −
brand-hover #88b609 −
brand-active #739707 −
brand-pale #e8f3c6 −
brand-deep #476005 −
brand-soft #0c1102 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-faint #5e5e5e −
text-on-brand #000000 −
link #ffffff −
link-hover #a0d10b −
border-input #3d3d3d −
recovery-green #16ec06 −
recovery-yellow #ffde00 −
recovery-red #ff0026 −
strain-blue #0093e7 −
sleep-blue #7eb8d9 −
hrv-purple #9c7ed9 −
info #0093e7 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":72} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} ~
label {"family":"Inter","size":11} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
xl 48px → 64px