Warp vs Composio
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#121212 → #0f0f0f Text
#ffffff → #ffffff Brand
#c2ff00 → #0007cd Border
#2a2a2a → #222222 Display font
Inter → abcDiatype Body size
16px → 16px colors 53 changed
~
bg #121212 → #0f0f0f ~
brand #c2ff00 → #0007cd ~
brand-glow rgba(194,255,0,0.20) → #1a26ff ~
on-brand #121212 → #ffffff ~
link #7eb8ff → #1a26ff ~
link-hover #a3cdff → #0007cd ~
border #2a2a2a → #222222 ~
border-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.06) → #1a1a1a ~
border-strong rgba(255,255,255,0.12) → #333333 +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface #181818 +
surface-elevated #222222 +
surface-strong #2a2a2a +
text-body #a8a8a8 +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-muted #888888 +
text-faint #666666 +
brand-active #0005a3 +
on-dark #ffffff +
border-brand rgba(0,7,205,0.4) +
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-glow-blue rgba(26,38,255,0.25) +
accent-cyan #00d4ff +
accent-violet #7b3aed +
success #33d17a +
warning #f59e0b +
danger #ff4d4d +
info #1a26ff −
bg-100 #1a1a1a −
bg-200 #222222 −
bg-300 #2c2c2c −
bg-400 #363636 −
surface-terminal #0e0e0e −
surface-card #1a1a1a −
surface-banner #f5f5f5 −
text-200 #cccccc −
text-300 #999999 −
text-400 #666666 −
text-500 #444444 −
text-banner #0a0a0a −
brand-soft #7a9e1f −
cta-bg #ffffff −
cta-text #000000 −
cta-bg-hover #f5f5f5 −
terminal-cursor #c2ff00 −
terminal-prompt #a78bfa −
terminal-success #86efac −
terminal-error #fca5a5 −
terminal-warning #fde047 −
semantic-success #86efac −
semantic-warning #fde047 −
semantic-danger #fca5a5 −
semantic-info #7eb8ff typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":96} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":56} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":16} ~
label {"family":"Hack","size":12} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":11} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 2 changed
~
lg 48px → 32px ~
xl 96px → 64px