Udio vs Temporal
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #141414 Text
#f9f9f9 → #f8fafc Brand
#e30b5d → #444ce7 Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #2a2a2a Display font
InnovatorFont → Aeonik Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #000000 → #141414 ~
surface #0a0a0a → #1a1a1a ~
text #f9f9f9 → #f8fafc ~
text-muted #c2c2c2 → #94a3b8 ~
brand #e30b5d → #444ce7 ~
link #f9f9f9 → #444ce7 ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #2a2a2a ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #3a3a3a +
surface-elevated #222222 +
surface-code #243349 +
surface-pre #1f2937 +
text-body #cbd5e1 +
text-inverse #141414 +
brand-bright #5b63f0 +
border-soft #222222 +
ring rgba(68,76,231,0.5) +
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
code-text #f8fafc +
code-keyword #fed553 +
success #34d399 +
warning #fed553 +
danger #f43f5e +
info #444ce7 −
bg-alt #08080a −
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-soft #8a8a8a −
text-faint #737373 −
brand-deep #c2094f −
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
link-hover #e30b5d −
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
disabled #737373 −
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) −
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) −
success-text #86efac −
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) −
warning-text #fcd34d −
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) −
danger-text #fca5a5 −
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
info-text #c2c2c2 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":68} ~
h1 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":32} ~
body {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.