Udio vs Sourcegraph
47 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #1a1817 Text
#f9f9f9 → #ededed Brand
#e30b5d → #f34e3f Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #34302d Display font
InnovatorFont → PolySans Body size
16px → 16px colors 42 changed
~
bg #000000 → #1a1817 ~
surface #0a0a0a → #222222 ~
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) → #1f1d1c ~
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #2c2a28 ~
text #f9f9f9 → #ededed ~
text-muted #c2c2c2 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #b8b8b8 ~
text-faint #737373 → #7a7672 ~
brand #e30b5d → #f34e3f ~
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) → rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) ~
link #f9f9f9 → #f34e3f ~
link-hover #e30b5d → #ff6354 ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #34302d ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #48433f +
bg-soft #211f1d +
bg-elev #252321 +
brand-hover #ff6354 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
border-soft #2a2724 +
focus-ring #f34e3f +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
bg-alt #08080a −
brand-deep #c2094f −
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
disabled #737373 −
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) −
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) −
success-text #86efac −
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) −
warning-text #fcd34d −
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) −
danger-text #fca5a5 −
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
info-text #c2c2c2 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 12px → 24px spacing identical
No differences.