Sourcegraph vs Udio
47 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #000000 Text
#ededed → #f9f9f9 Brand
#f34e3f → #e30b5d Border
#34302d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
PolySans → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 42 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #000000 ~
surface #222222 → #0a0a0a ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) ~
surface-strong #2c2a28 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
text #ededed → #f9f9f9 ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #8a8a8a ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #c2c2c2 ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #737373 ~
brand #f34e3f → #e30b5d ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
link #f34e3f → #f9f9f9 ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #e30b5d ~
border #34302d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #48433f → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) +
bg-alt #08080a +
brand-deep #c2094f +
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
brand-hover #ff6354 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
border-soft #2a2724 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.