Udio vs Hume AI
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #fff9f3 Text
#f9f9f9 → #222222 Brand
#e30b5d → #222222 Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #e7dccd Display font
InnovatorFont → Fellix Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #000000 → #fff9f3 ~
surface #0a0a0a → #f7ede1 ~
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #efe2d2 ~
text #f9f9f9 → #222222 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-muted #c2c2c2 → #5c554e ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #7a7269 ~
text-faint #737373 → #a89e92 ~
brand #e30b5d → #222222 ~
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) → #3a3633 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fff9f3 ~
link #f9f9f9 → #222222 ~
link-hover #e30b5d → #000000 ~
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) → #f3e7da ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #e7dccd ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #d9cdbb ~
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) → #e3efe0 ~
success-text #86efac → #3f6b3a ~
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) → #fbeecf ~
warning-text #fcd34d → #8a6420 ~
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) → #f7e0db ~
danger-text #fca5a5 → #a4362a ~
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #e8e6e3 ~
info-text #c2c2c2 → #3a3633 +
bg-soft #fdf4ec +
surface-hover #f4e8da +
text-medium #3a3633 +
on-cta #fff9f3 +
brand-hover #000000 +
accent #e8d5c4 +
accent-deep #d9bfa6 +
accent-faint #f3e7da +
disabled-bg #f4e8da +
disabled-text #a89e92 +
border-soft #f0e6d9 +
border-focus #222222 +
shadow-rgb 34, 28, 22 +
shadow-warm 160, 120, 80 −
bg-alt #08080a −
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
brand-deep #c2094f −
disabled #737373 −
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} → {"family":"Fellix","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} → {"family":"Fellix","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} → {"family":"Fellix","size":36} ~
body {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} → {"family":"Fellix","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 8px → 10px ~
card 12px → 18px spacing identical
No differences.