Hume AI vs Udio
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fff9f3 → #000000 Text
#222222 → #f9f9f9 Brand
#222222 → #e30b5d Border
#e7dccd → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Fellix → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #fff9f3 → #000000 ~
surface #f7ede1 → #0a0a0a ~
surface-strong #efe2d2 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
text #222222 → #f9f9f9 ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5c554e → #c2c2c2 ~
text-soft #7a7269 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #a89e92 → #737373 ~
on-brand #fff9f3 → #ffffff ~
brand #222222 → #e30b5d ~
brand-soft #3a3633 → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
link #222222 → #f9f9f9 ~
link-hover #000000 → #e30b5d ~
selected-bg #f3e7da → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
border #e7dccd → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #d9cdbb → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) ~
success-bg #e3efe0 → rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) ~
success-text #3f6b3a → #86efac ~
warning-bg #fbeecf → rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) ~
warning-text #8a6420 → #fcd34d ~
danger-bg #f7e0db → rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) ~
danger-text #a4362a → #fca5a5 ~
info-bg #e8e6e3 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
info-text #3a3633 → #c2c2c2 +
bg-alt #08080a +
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
brand-deep #c2094f +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) −
bg-soft #fdf4ec −
surface-hover #f4e8da −
text-medium #3a3633 −
on-cta #fff9f3 −
brand-hover #000000 −
accent #e8d5c4 −
accent-deep #d9bfa6 −
accent-faint #f3e7da −
disabled-bg #f4e8da −
disabled-text #a89e92 −
border-soft #f0e6d9 −
border-focus #222222 −
shadow-rgb 34, 28, 22 −
shadow-warm 160, 120, 80 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Fellix","size":80} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Fellix","size":48} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Fellix","size":36} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Fellix","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 10px → 8px ~
card 18px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.