Udio vs Glif
49 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #fcfaf6 Text
#f9f9f9 → #0e0e10 Brand
#e30b5d → #2e9e4f Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #0000000f Display font
InnovatorFont → Manrope Body size
16px → 16px colors 45 changed
~
bg #000000 → #fcfaf6 ~
surface #0a0a0a → #ffffff ~
text #f9f9f9 → #0e0e10 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-muted #c2c2c2 → #55555a ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #86868c ~
text-faint #737373 → #b8b8be ~
brand #e30b5d → #2e9e4f ~
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) → #e6f4ea ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fffaef ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #0000000f ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #0000001f ~
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) → #00000008 ~
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) → #e6f4ea ~
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) → #fdf2dc ~
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) → #fbe7e7 ~
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #e6f4ea +
bg-soft #f6f3ec +
bg-elev #f1ede4 +
surface-2 #f6f3ec +
surface-3 #ebe6db +
brand-hover #28893f +
brand-active #22742f +
accent-warm #fffbf6 +
accent-warm-deep #f3ece0 +
accent-lilac #efeaff +
accent-sky #e6f1fb +
border-focus #2e9e4f +
success #2e9e4f +
warning #d98a00 +
danger #d83a3a +
info #2e9e4f −
bg-alt #08080a −
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
brand-deep #c2094f −
link #f9f9f9 −
link-hover #e30b5d −
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
disabled #737373 −
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) −
success-text #86efac −
warning-text #fcd34d −
danger-text #fca5a5 −
info-text #c2c2c2 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} → {"family":"Manrope","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} → {"family":"Manrope","size":54} ~
h2 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} → {"family":"Manrope","size":40} ~
body {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} → {"family":"Manrope","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.