Glif vs Udio
49 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fcfaf6 → #000000 Text
#0e0e10 → #f9f9f9 Brand
#2e9e4f → #e30b5d Border
#0000000f → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Manrope → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 45 changed
~
bg #fcfaf6 → #000000 ~
surface #ffffff → #0a0a0a ~
text #0e0e10 → #f9f9f9 ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #55555a → #c2c2c2 ~
text-soft #86868c → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #b8b8be → #737373 ~
brand #2e9e4f → #e30b5d ~
brand-soft #e6f4ea → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
on-brand #fffaef → #ffffff ~
border #0000000f → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #0000001f → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) ~
border-subtle #00000008 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) ~
success-bg #e6f4ea → rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) ~
warning-bg #fdf2dc → rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) ~
danger-bg #fbe7e7 → rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) ~
info-bg #e6f4ea → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
bg-alt #08080a +
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
brand-deep #c2094f +
link #f9f9f9 +
link-hover #e30b5d +
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
disabled #737373 +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
bg-soft #f6f3ec −
bg-elev #f1ede4 −
surface-2 #f6f3ec −
surface-3 #ebe6db −
brand-hover #28893f −
brand-active #22742f −
accent-warm #fffbf6 −
accent-warm-deep #f3ece0 −
accent-lilac #efeaff −
accent-sky #e6f1fb −
border-focus #2e9e4f −
success #2e9e4f −
warning #d98a00 −
danger #d83a3a −
info #2e9e4f typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Manrope","size":80} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Manrope","size":54} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Manrope","size":40} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Manrope","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.