Udio vs Accenture
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0a0a0a Text
#f9f9f9 → #ffffff Brand
#e30b5d → #a600ff Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #2e2e2e Display font
InnovatorFont → Graphik Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0a0a0a ~
surface #0a0a0a → #141414 ~
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) → #1c1c1c ~
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #262626 ~
text #f9f9f9 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #c2c2c2 → #a3a3a3 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #6b6b6b ~
brand #e30b5d → #a600ff ~
brand-deep #c2094f → #7d00c4 ~
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) → rgba(166,0,255,0.12) ~
link #f9f9f9 → #ffffff ~
link-hover #e30b5d → #a600ff ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) → #2e2e2e ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) → #4d4d4d +
bg-pure #000000 +
surface-light #ffffff +
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 +
text-body #e6e6e6 +
text-on-light #0a0a0a +
text-on-light-mute #525252 +
brand-bright #be4bff +
border-on-light #e0e0e0 +
focus #a600ff +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) +
success #3ad29f +
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) +
warning #ffb800 +
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) +
danger #ff5252 +
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) +
info #a600ff +
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) −
bg-alt #08080a −
text-faint #737373 −
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) −
disabled #737373 −
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) −
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) −
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) −
success-text #86efac −
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) −
warning-text #fcd34d −
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) −
danger-text #fca5a5 −
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
info-text #c2c2c2 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} → {"family":"Graphik","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} → {"family":"Graphik","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} → {"family":"Graphik","size":32} ~
body {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} → {"family":"Graphik","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.