Accenture vs Udio
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0a0a0a → #000000 Text
#ffffff → #f9f9f9 Brand
#a600ff → #e30b5d Border
#2e2e2e → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Graphik → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #0a0a0a → #000000 ~
surface #141414 → #0a0a0a ~
surface-soft #1c1c1c → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) ~
surface-strong #262626 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
text #ffffff → #f9f9f9 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #c2c2c2 ~
text-soft #6b6b6b → #8a8a8a ~
brand #a600ff → #e30b5d ~
brand-deep #7d00c4 → #c2094f ~
brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
border #2e2e2e → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #4d4d4d → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) ~
link #ffffff → #f9f9f9 ~
link-hover #a600ff → #e30b5d +
bg-alt #08080a +
text-faint #737373 +
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
bg-pure #000000 −
surface-light #ffffff −
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 −
text-body #e6e6e6 −
text-on-light #0a0a0a −
text-on-light-mute #525252 −
brand-bright #be4bff −
border-on-light #e0e0e0 −
focus #a600ff −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) −
success #3ad29f −
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) −
warning #ffb800 −
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) −
danger #ff5252 −
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) −
info #a600ff −
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Graphik","size":80} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Graphik","size":40} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Graphik","size":32} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Graphik","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.