Tinybird vs Sourcegraph
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0a0a0a → #1a1817 Text
#ffffff → #ededed Brand
#27f795 → #f34e3f Border
#262626 → #34302d Display font
Inter → PolySans Body size
16px → 16px colors 53 changed
~
bg #0a0a0a → #1a1817 ~
surface #151515 → #222222 ~
surface-soft #101010 → #1f1d1c ~
text #ffffff → #ededed ~
text-strong #e6e6e6 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #888888 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-faint #5a5a5a → #7a7672 ~
brand #27f795 → #f34e3f ~
on-brand #0a0a0a → #ffffff ~
link #27f795 → #f34e3f ~
link-hover #1fd87f → #ff6354 ~
border #262626 → #34302d ~
border-strong #383838 → #48433f +
bg-soft #211f1d +
bg-elev #252321 +
surface-strong #2c2a28 +
text-soft #b8b8b8 +
brand-hover #ff6354 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
border-soft #2a2724 +
focus-ring #f34e3f +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
bg-deep #000000 −
surface-elevated #1e1e1e −
surface-mint-tint rgba(255,255,255,0.05) −
text-body #b0b0b0 −
brand-dark #008060 −
brand-active #1fd87f −
brand-disabled #16402e −
on-brand-dark #ffffff −
on-dark #ffffff −
border-mint #27f795 −
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
shadow-glow-mint rgba(39,247,149,0.18) −
code-text #ffffff −
code-invocation #27f795 −
code-success #27f795 −
code-error #ff8389 −
code-identifier #00c1ff −
code-value #fc9f5b −
code-diff-added #008060 −
success #27f795 −
warning #fc9f5b −
danger #ff8389 −
info #00c1ff typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":80} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":64} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":44} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 12px → 24px spacing identical
No differences.