Sourcegraph vs Tinybird
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #0a0a0a Text
#ededed → #ffffff Brand
#f34e3f → #27f795 Border
#34302d → #262626 Display font
PolySans → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 53 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #0a0a0a ~
surface #222222 → #151515 ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → #101010 ~
text #ededed → #ffffff ~
text-strong #ffffff → #e6e6e6 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #888888 ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #5a5a5a ~
brand #f34e3f → #27f795 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #0a0a0a ~
link #f34e3f → #27f795 ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #1fd87f ~
border #34302d → #262626 ~
border-strong #48433f → #383838 +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface-elevated #1e1e1e +
surface-mint-tint rgba(255,255,255,0.05) +
text-body #b0b0b0 +
brand-dark #008060 +
brand-active #1fd87f +
brand-disabled #16402e +
on-brand-dark #ffffff +
on-dark #ffffff +
border-mint #27f795 +
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-glow-mint rgba(39,247,149,0.18) +
code-text #ffffff +
code-invocation #27f795 +
code-success #27f795 +
code-error #ff8389 +
code-identifier #00c1ff +
code-value #fc9f5b +
code-diff-added #008060 +
success #27f795 +
warning #fc9f5b +
danger #ff8389 +
info #00c1ff −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
text-soft #b8b8b8 −
brand-hover #ff6354 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
border-soft #2a2724 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"Inter","size":64} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"Inter","size":44} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.