Tana vs Supabase
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #121212 Text
#f0eded → #fafafa Brand
#e1f0bd → #3ecf8e Border
#1f1f1f → #2e2e2e Display font
tanaClassic → Circular Body size
17px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #000000 → #121212 ~
bg-deep #050505 → #0a0a0a ~
text #f0eded → #fafafa ~
text-muted #a8a5a3 → #6a6a6a ~
text-faint #555250 → #4a4a4a ~
text-on-brand #000000 → #161616 ~
brand #e1f0bd → #3ecf8e ~
brand-soft #1f2516 → #a3e9c5 ~
link #e1f0bd → #3ecf8e ~
link-hover #ffffff → #a3e9c5 ~
border #1f1f1f → #2e2e2e ~
border-strong #2a2a2a → #363636 ~
focus-ring #e1f0bd → #3ecf8e ~
selection-bg #e1f0bd → #3ecf8e ~
selection-text #000000 → #161616 ~
shadow rgba(0,0,0,0.6) → rgba(0,0,0,0.4) ~
success #a8d896 → #3ecf8e ~
warning #e6c07a → #fbb024 ~
danger #e89a8d → #ff5a5a ~
info #9bb8d4 → #5ac4ee ~
on-brand #000000 → #161616 +
bg-alt #0f0f0f +
surface-75 #171717 +
surface-100 #1c1c1c +
surface-200 #212121 +
surface-300 #262626 +
overlay #242424 +
overlay-hover #2e2e2e +
text-light #b4b4b4 +
text-lighter #898989 +
brand-link #00c46a +
brand-deep #006239 +
brand-subtle #1c2e23 +
brand-glow rgba(62,207,142,0.3) +
border-muted #242424 +
border-overlay #404040 +
shadow-brand rgba(0,98,57,0.4) −
bg-soft #0a0a0a −
surface #141414 −
surface-raised #1a1a1a −
surface-overlay #1f1f1f −
surface-inverted #f0eded −
text-soft #7a7775 −
brand-hover #cde0a3 −
brand-active #b8cc88 −
accent-italic #d4caa8 −
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a −
border-soft #161616 −
border-inverted #d8d5d3 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} → {"family":"Circular","size":96} ~
h1 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} → {"family":"Circular","size":72} ~
h2 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} → {"family":"Circular","size":48} ~
body {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} → {"family":"Circular","size":16} ~
label {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} → {"family":"Office Code Pro","size":11} radius 1 changed
~
button 8px → 6px spacing identical
No differences.