Tana vs Sourcegraph
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #1a1817 Text
#f0eded → #ededed Brand
#e1f0bd → #f34e3f Border
#1f1f1f → #34302d Display font
tanaClassic → PolySans Body size
17px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #000000 → #1a1817 ~
bg-soft #0a0a0a → #211f1d ~
surface #141414 → #222222 ~
text #f0eded → #ededed ~
text-muted #a8a5a3 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-soft #7a7775 → #b8b8b8 ~
text-faint #555250 → #7a7672 ~
brand #e1f0bd → #f34e3f ~
brand-hover #cde0a3 → #ff6354 ~
brand-soft #1f2516 → rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) ~
link #e1f0bd → #f34e3f ~
link-hover #ffffff → #ff6354 ~
border #1f1f1f → #34302d ~
border-soft #161616 → #2a2724 ~
border-strong #2a2a2a → #48433f ~
focus-ring #e1f0bd → #f34e3f ~
on-brand #000000 → #ffffff +
bg-elev #252321 +
surface-soft #1f1d1c +
surface-strong #2c2a28 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
bg-deep #050505 −
surface-raised #1a1a1a −
surface-overlay #1f1f1f −
surface-inverted #f0eded −
text-on-brand #000000 −
text-on-inverted #0a0a0a −
brand-active #b8cc88 −
accent-italic #d4caa8 −
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a −
border-inverted #d8d5d3 −
selection-bg #e1f0bd −
selection-text #000000 −
shadow rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
success #a8d896 −
warning #e6c07a −
danger #e89a8d −
info #9bb8d4 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 3 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px