Sourcegraph vs Tana
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #000000 Text
#ededed → #f0eded Brand
#f34e3f → #e1f0bd Border
#34302d → #1f1f1f Display font
PolySans → tanaClassic Body size
16px → 17px colors 46 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #000000 ~
bg-soft #211f1d → #0a0a0a ~
surface #222222 → #141414 ~
text #ededed → #f0eded ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #7a7775 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #a8a5a3 ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #555250 ~
brand #f34e3f → #e1f0bd ~
brand-hover #ff6354 → #cde0a3 ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → #1f2516 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #000000 ~
link #f34e3f → #e1f0bd ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #ffffff ~
border #34302d → #1f1f1f ~
border-soft #2a2724 → #161616 ~
border-strong #48433f → #2a2a2a ~
focus-ring #f34e3f → #e1f0bd +
bg-deep #050505 +
surface-raised #1a1a1a +
surface-overlay #1f1f1f +
surface-inverted #f0eded +
text-on-brand #000000 +
text-on-inverted #0a0a0a +
brand-active #b8cc88 +
accent-italic #d4caa8 +
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a +
border-inverted #d8d5d3 +
selection-bg #e1f0bd +
selection-text #000000 +
shadow rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
success #a8d896 +
warning #e6c07a +
danger #e89a8d +
info #9bb8d4 −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-soft #1f1d1c −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 3 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px