Tana vs Composio
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0f0f0f Text
#f0eded → #ffffff Brand
#e1f0bd → #0007cd Border
#1f1f1f → #222222 Display font
tanaClassic → abcDiatype Body size
17px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0f0f0f ~
bg-deep #050505 → #000000 ~
surface #141414 → #181818 ~
text #f0eded → #ffffff ~
text-muted #a8a5a3 → #888888 ~
text-faint #555250 → #666666 ~
brand #e1f0bd → #0007cd ~
brand-active #b8cc88 → #0005a3 ~
link #e1f0bd → #1a26ff ~
link-hover #ffffff → #0007cd ~
border #1f1f1f → #222222 ~
border-soft #161616 → #1a1a1a ~
border-strong #2a2a2a → #333333 ~
success #a8d896 → #33d17a ~
warning #e6c07a → #f59e0b ~
danger #e89a8d → #ff4d4d ~
info #9bb8d4 → #1a26ff ~
on-brand #000000 → #ffffff +
surface-elevated #222222 +
surface-strong #2a2a2a +
text-body #a8a8a8 +
brand-glow #1a26ff +
on-dark #ffffff +
border-brand rgba(0,7,205,0.4) +
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-glow-blue rgba(26,38,255,0.25) +
accent-cyan #00d4ff +
accent-violet #7b3aed −
bg-soft #0a0a0a −
surface-raised #1a1a1a −
surface-overlay #1f1f1f −
surface-inverted #f0eded −
text-soft #7a7775 −
text-on-brand #000000 −
text-on-inverted #0a0a0a −
brand-hover #cde0a3 −
brand-soft #1f2516 −
accent-italic #d4caa8 −
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a −
border-inverted #d8d5d3 −
focus-ring #e1f0bd −
selection-bg #e1f0bd −
selection-text #000000 −
shadow rgba(0,0,0,0.6) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":32} ~
body {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} → {"family":"abcDiatype","size":16} ~
label {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":11} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.