Tailscale vs fal
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f9f7f6 → #ffffff Text
#181717 → #000000 Brand
#d04841 → #252527 Border
rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.12) → #e5e7eb Display font
Inter → focal Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #f9f7f6 → #ffffff ~
text #181717 → #000000 ~
text-faint #a39e9b → #9ca3af ~
brand #d04841 → #252527 ~
brand-hover #b83d37 → #0a0a0a ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fafafa ~
border rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.12) → #e5e7eb ~
border-soft rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.07) → #f0f0f0 ~
border-strong rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.22) → #d1d5db ~
success #2f7d52 → #16a34a ~
warning #c9821f → #d97706 ~
danger #d04841 → #dc2626 ~
info #181717 → #2563eb +
bg-soft #fafafa +
surface-elevated #ffffff +
surface-dark #0a0a0a +
surface-soft #f5f5f5 +
text-body #1b1b1d +
text-muted #6b7280 +
text-on-dark #fafafa −
bg-pure #ffffff −
bg-elev #f3f0ee −
bg-warm #efeae7 −
bg-ink #181717 −
bg-ink-soft #232222 −
surface-warm #f9f7f6 −
text-secondary #4a4746 −
text-tertiary #736f6d −
text-on-ink #f5f2f0 −
text-on-ink-soft #a39e9b −
brand-deep #9e332e −
brand-soft rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.10) −
brand-tint rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.06) −
link #d04841 −
link-hover #b83d37 −
focus rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.40) −
cta-bg #d04841 −
cta-text #ffffff −
cta-bg-secondary #232222 −
cta-text-secondary #ffffff −
border-ink #181717 −
shadow-ambient rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.04) −
shadow-card rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.06) −
shadow-elev rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.08) −
shadow-deep rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.14) −
scrim rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.45) −
success-soft rgba(47, 125, 82, 0.10) −
warning-soft rgba(201, 130, 31, 0.10) −
danger-soft rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.10) −
info-soft rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.06) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":80} → {"family":"focal","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":48} → {"family":"focal","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"focal","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"publicSansRounded","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.