fal vs Tailscale
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #f9f7f6 Text
#000000 → #181717 Brand
#252527 → #d04841 Border
#e5e7eb → rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.12) Display font
focal → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #f9f7f6 ~
text #000000 → #181717 ~
text-faint #9ca3af → #a39e9b ~
brand #252527 → #d04841 ~
brand-hover #0a0a0a → #b83d37 ~
on-brand #fafafa → #ffffff ~
border #e5e7eb → rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.12) ~
border-strong #d1d5db → rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.22) ~
border-soft #f0f0f0 → rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.07) ~
success #16a34a → #2f7d52 ~
warning #d97706 → #c9821f ~
danger #dc2626 → #d04841 ~
info #2563eb → #181717 +
bg-pure #ffffff +
bg-elev #f3f0ee +
bg-warm #efeae7 +
bg-ink #181717 +
bg-ink-soft #232222 +
surface-warm #f9f7f6 +
text-secondary #4a4746 +
text-tertiary #736f6d +
text-on-ink #f5f2f0 +
text-on-ink-soft #a39e9b +
brand-deep #9e332e +
brand-soft rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.10) +
brand-tint rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.06) +
link #d04841 +
link-hover #b83d37 +
focus rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.40) +
cta-bg #d04841 +
cta-text #ffffff +
cta-bg-secondary #232222 +
cta-text-secondary #ffffff +
border-ink #181717 +
shadow-ambient rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.04) +
shadow-card rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.06) +
shadow-elev rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.08) +
shadow-deep rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.14) +
scrim rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.45) +
success-soft rgba(47, 125, 82, 0.10) +
warning-soft rgba(201, 130, 31, 0.10) +
danger-soft rgba(208, 72, 65, 0.10) +
info-soft rgba(24, 23, 23, 0.06) −
bg-soft #fafafa −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
surface-dark #0a0a0a −
surface-soft #f5f5f5 −
text-body #1b1b1d −
text-muted #6b7280 −
text-on-dark #fafafa typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"focal","size":120} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"focal","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"focal","size":32} → {"family":"Inter","size":32} ~
body {"family":"publicSansRounded","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.