Sourcegraph vs CVS Health
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #ffffff Text
#ededed → #000000 Brand
#f34e3f → #cc0000 Border
#34302d → #000000 Display font
PolySans → CVS Sans Regular Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #ffffff ~
bg-soft #211f1d → #f7f7f7 ~
surface #222222 → #ffffff ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → #f7f7f7 ~
text #ededed → #000000 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #767676 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #5b5b5b ~
brand #f34e3f → #cc0000 ~
brand-hover #ff6354 → #a30000 ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → #e34a4a ~
link #f34e3f → #cc0000 ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #a30000 ~
border #34302d → #000000 ~
border-soft #2a2724 → #d7d7d7 ~
border-strong #48433f → #000000 ~
focus-ring #f34e3f → #cc0000 +
surface-muted #efefef +
surface-red-tint #fdeaea +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
brand-active #8a0000 +
link-visited #7a1f5c +
border-input #767676 +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.55) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.08) +
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.16) +
success #1f7a3d +
success-soft #e7f3ec +
warning #9a6700 +
warning-soft #fbf3e0 +
danger #cc0000 +
danger-soft #fdeaea +
info #005a9c +
info-soft #e6f0f8 −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
text-faint #7a7672 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":32} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":28} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.