CVS Health vs Sourcegraph
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #1a1817 Text
#000000 → #ededed Brand
#cc0000 → #f34e3f Border
#000000 → #34302d Display font
CVS Sans Regular → PolySans Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #1a1817 ~
bg-soft #f7f7f7 → #211f1d ~
surface #ffffff → #222222 ~
surface-soft #f7f7f7 → #1f1d1c ~
text #000000 → #ededed ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5b5b5b → #a0a0a0 ~
text-soft #767676 → #b8b8b8 ~
brand #cc0000 → #f34e3f ~
brand-hover #a30000 → #ff6354 ~
brand-soft #e34a4a → rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) ~
link #cc0000 → #f34e3f ~
link-hover #a30000 → #ff6354 ~
border #000000 → #34302d ~
border-soft #d7d7d7 → #2a2724 ~
border-strong #000000 → #48433f ~
focus-ring #cc0000 → #f34e3f +
bg-elev #252321 +
surface-strong #2c2a28 +
text-faint #7a7672 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
surface-muted #efefef −
surface-red-tint #fdeaea −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-dark #ffffff −
brand-active #8a0000 −
link-visited #7a1f5c −
border-input #767676 −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.55) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.08) −
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.16) −
success #1f7a3d −
success-soft #e7f3ec −
warning #9a6700 −
warning-soft #fbf3e0 −
danger #cc0000 −
danger-soft #fdeaea −
info #005a9c −
info-soft #e6f0f8 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":80} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":32} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":28} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"CVS Sans Regular","size":16} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 12px → 24px spacing identical
No differences.