Pitch vs CodeSandbox
46 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #0e0e0e Text
#000000 → #f0f0f0 Brand
#5318eb → #eaff96 Border
#e4e2ee → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) Display font
Mark Pro Bold → TWK Everett Body size
16px → 16px colors 41 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #0e0e0e ~
surface #0a0a0a → #1d1d1d ~
text #000000 → #f0f0f0 ~
text-muted #5b5b66 → #a0a0a0 ~
brand #5318eb → #eaff96 ~
brand-hover #4512c9 → #f1ffb0 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #343434 ~
brand-tint #ebe3fe → rgba(234,255,150,0.07) ~
link #0000ee → #e3ff73 ~
link-hover #3a0fab → #edff9a ~
border #e4e2ee → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) ~
border-strong #cbc8da → rgba(240,240,240,0.18) ~
success #16a34a → #7ee787 ~
warning #d97706 → #f0b429 ~
danger #dc2626 → #ff6b6b ~
info #5318eb → #e3ff73 +
bg-deep #080808 +
bg-elevated #1d1d1d +
surface-high #262626 +
surface-low #141414 +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
text-faint #5c5c5c +
brand-deep #d6f06a +
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) +
lime-text #e3ff73 +
lime-text-hover #edff9a +
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) +
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) +
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) +
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) +
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) +
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) −
bg-hero #000000 −
surface-light #f6f5fb −
text-on-hero #ffffff −
text-muted-on-hero #a8a8b3 −
brand-active #3a0fab −
border-on-hero #26262e typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":180} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":56} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":40} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Mark Pro","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":14} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.