CodeSandbox vs Pitch
46 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0e0e0e → #ffffff Text
#f0f0f0 → #000000 Brand
#eaff96 → #5318eb Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #e4e2ee Display font
TWK Everett → Mark Pro Bold Body size
16px → 16px colors 41 changed
~
bg #0e0e0e → #ffffff ~
surface #1d1d1d → #0a0a0a ~
text #f0f0f0 → #000000 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #5b5b66 ~
brand #eaff96 → #5318eb ~
brand-hover #f1ffb0 → #4512c9 ~
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) → #ebe3fe ~
on-brand #343434 → #ffffff ~
link #e3ff73 → #0000ee ~
link-hover #edff9a → #3a0fab ~
border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #e4e2ee ~
border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) → #cbc8da ~
success #7ee787 → #16a34a ~
warning #f0b429 → #d97706 ~
danger #ff6b6b → #dc2626 ~
info #e3ff73 → #5318eb +
bg-hero #000000 +
surface-light #f6f5fb +
text-on-hero #ffffff +
text-muted-on-hero #a8a8b3 +
brand-active #3a0fab +
border-on-hero #26262e −
bg-deep #080808 −
bg-elevated #1d1d1d −
surface-high #262626 −
surface-low #141414 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-soft #8a8a8a −
text-faint #5c5c5c −
brand-deep #d6f06a −
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) −
lime-text #e3ff73 −
lime-text-hover #edff9a −
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) −
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) −
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) −
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) −
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) −
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} → {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":180} ~
h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} → {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} → {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Mark Pro","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":14} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.