Patagonia vs Wispr Flow
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f6efe1 → #ffffeb Text
#1c1c1c → #1a1a1a Brand
#cd0000 → #f0d7ff Border
#d8d0bc → #1a1a1a4d Display font
Futura PT → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #f6efe1 → #ffffeb ~
surface #ffffff → #034f46 ~
surface-soft #fbf8ed → #e4e4d0 ~
brand #cd0000 → #f0d7ff ~
on-brand #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
text #1c1c1c → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #5a5a5a → #666666 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #888888 ~
border #d8d0bc → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-strong #bcb09a → #1a1a1a80 ~
border-soft #e8e0c8 → #1a1a1a1a ~
success #3d4a2e → #114e0b ~
warning #cb9c45 → #5e5515 ~
danger #a80000 → #7f1c34 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
white #ffffff +
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50) +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-soft #fdf9ed −
bg-deeper #ebe3d0 −
bg-warm #f9f3e3 −
surface-deeper #ede5d0 −
brand-hover #a80000 −
brand-pressed #820000 −
brand-deep #5a0000 −
brand-tint #fde0e0 −
forest #3d4a2e −
forest-deep #293421 −
forest-soft #dde3d4 −
text-strong #000000 −
text-faint #bcbcbc −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
link #cd0000 −
link-hover #820000 −
selected-bg #fde0e0 −
border-brand #cd0000 −
amber #cb9c45 −
info #3d4a2e typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Futura PT","size":80} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Futura PT","size":36} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Futura PT","size":28} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Futura PT","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius 2 changed
~
button 4px → 8px ~
card 14px → 12px spacing 2 changed
~
lg 24px → 32px ~
xl 40px → 64px