Obsidian vs CodeSandbox
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #0e0e0e Text
#eeeeee → #f0f0f0 Brand
#7c3aed → #eaff96 Border
#2a2a2a → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) Display font
Inter → TWK Everett Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #0e0e0e ~
bg-deep #0a0a0a → #080808 ~
surface #161616 → #1d1d1d ~
text #eeeeee → #f0f0f0 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-faint #737373 → #5c5c5c ~
brand #7c3aed → #eaff96 ~
brand-hover #6d28d9 → #f1ffb0 ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(234,255,150,0.14) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #343434 ~
border #2a2a2a → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) ~
border-soft #1f1f1f → rgba(240,240,240,0.06) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(240,240,240,0.18) ~
border-brand #7c3aed → rgba(234,255,150,0.45) ~
success #4ade80 → #7ee787 ~
warning #fbbf24 → #f0b429 ~
danger #f87171 → #ff6b6b ~
info #a78bfa → #e3ff73 +
bg-elevated #1d1d1d +
surface-high #262626 +
surface-low #141414 +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
brand-deep #d6f06a +
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) +
lime-text #e3ff73 +
lime-text-hover #edff9a +
link #e3ff73 +
link-hover #edff9a +
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) +
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) +
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) +
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-secondary #b0b0b0 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
success-soft #14321f −
warning-soft #33270a −
danger-soft #3a1717 typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.