CodeSandbox vs Obsidian
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0e0e0e → #0f0f0f Text
#f0f0f0 → #eeeeee Brand
#eaff96 → #7c3aed Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #2a2a2a Display font
TWK Everett → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #0e0e0e → #0f0f0f ~
bg-deep #080808 → #0a0a0a ~
surface #1d1d1d → #161616 ~
text #f0f0f0 → #eeeeee ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #a3a3a3 ~
text-faint #5c5c5c → #737373 ~
brand #eaff96 → #7c3aed ~
brand-hover #f1ffb0 → #6d28d9 ~
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) → #2a1a4a ~
on-brand #343434 → #ffffff ~
border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #2a2a2a ~
border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) → #3a3a3a ~
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) → #1f1f1f ~
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) → #7c3aed ~
success #7ee787 → #4ade80 ~
warning #f0b429 → #fbbf24 ~
danger #ff6b6b → #f87171 ~
info #e3ff73 → #a78bfa +
surface-elev #1f1f1f +
surface-hover #262626 +
text-secondary #b0b0b0 +
brand-active #5b21b6 +
brand-text #a78bfa +
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
success-soft #14321f +
warning-soft #33270a +
danger-soft #3a1717 −
bg-elevated #1d1d1d −
surface-high #262626 −
surface-low #141414 −
text-soft #8a8a8a −
brand-deep #d6f06a −
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) −
lime-text #e3ff73 −
lime-text-hover #edff9a −
link #e3ff73 −
link-hover #edff9a −
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) −
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) −
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) −
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} → {"family":"Inter","size":60} ~
h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} → {"family":"Inter","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":32} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.