Hyperliquid vs Chase
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#04060c → #ffffff Text
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) → #101820 Brand
#97fce4 → #0060f0 Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) → #d4d9e0 Display font
Inter → Open Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #04060c → #ffffff ~
surface #0a0d16 → #ffffff ~
text rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) → #101820 ~
text-muted rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.60) → #5a6470 ~
brand #97fce4 → #0060f0 ~
brand-deep #2fa89a → #003594 ~
on-brand #04060c → #ffffff ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) → #d4d9e0 ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.28) → #9aa3af ~
scrim rgba(2, 3, 7, 0.78) → rgba(16,24,32,0.55) ~
link #97fce4 → #0060f0 ~
link-hover #50d2c1 → #0048bf +
surface-soft #f5f7fa +
surface-tint #eef4ff +
text-faint #6b7280 +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
text-on-green #ffffff +
brand-hover #0048bf +
secondary #128842 +
secondary-hover #0e6e35 +
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) +
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) +
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) +
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) +
success #128842 +
warning #9a5b00 +
danger #c4001a +
info #0060f0 −
bg-elev-1 #0a0d16 −
bg-elev-2 #121622 −
bg-elev-3 #1a1f2e −
surface-row-hover #121622 −
text-body rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.78) −
text-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45) −
brand-strong #50d2c1 −
brand-soft rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.12) −
brand-glow rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.35) −
border-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) −
border-brand #97fce4 −
semantic-up #3fd68b −
semantic-up-soft rgba(63, 214, 139, 0.14) −
semantic-down #ff5470 −
semantic-down-soft rgba(255, 84, 112, 0.14) −
semantic-warning #ffd25f −
semantic-info #97fce4 −
focus-ring rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":80} → {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.