Chase vs Hyperliquid
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #04060c Text
#101820 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) Brand
#0060f0 → #97fce4 Border
#d4d9e0 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) Display font
Open Sans → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #04060c ~
surface #ffffff → #0a0d16 ~
text #101820 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) ~
text-muted #5a6470 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.60) ~
brand #0060f0 → #97fce4 ~
brand-deep #003594 → #2fa89a ~
link #0060f0 → #97fce4 ~
link-hover #0048bf → #50d2c1 ~
border #d4d9e0 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) ~
border-strong #9aa3af → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.28) ~
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) → rgba(2, 3, 7, 0.78) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #04060c +
bg-elev-1 #0a0d16 +
bg-elev-2 #121622 +
bg-elev-3 #1a1f2e +
surface-row-hover #121622 +
text-body rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.78) +
text-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45) +
brand-strong #50d2c1 +
brand-soft rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.12) +
brand-glow rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.35) +
border-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
border-brand #97fce4 +
semantic-up #3fd68b +
semantic-up-soft rgba(63, 214, 139, 0.14) +
semantic-down #ff5470 +
semantic-down-soft rgba(255, 84, 112, 0.14) +
semantic-warning #ffd25f +
semantic-info #97fce4 +
focus-ring rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.55) −
surface-soft #f5f7fa −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-faint #6b7280 −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-hover #0048bf −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) −
success #128842 −
warning #9a5b00 −
danger #c4001a −
info #0060f0 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"Inter","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.