Glif vs Pika
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fcfaf6 → #fcfaf7 Text
#0e0e10 → #0d0d0d Brand
#2e9e4f → #ffd184 Border
#0000000f → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) Display font
Manrope → telkaExtended Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #fcfaf6 → #fcfaf7 ~
text #0e0e10 → #0d0d0d ~
text-muted #55555a → #5c5c5c ~
text-soft #86868c → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #b8b8be → #b8b8b8 ~
brand #2e9e4f → #ffd184 ~
brand-soft #e6f4ea → rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) ~
on-brand #fffaef → #222222 ~
border #0000000f → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.10) ~
border-strong #0000001f → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.18) ~
border-subtle #00000008 → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.05) ~
success-bg #e6f4ea → rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) ~
warning-bg #fdf2dc → rgba(245, 190, 99, 0.20) ~
danger-bg #fbe7e7 → rgba(220, 38, 38, 0.10) ~
info-bg #e6f4ea → rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.06) +
bg-alt #f5f1ea +
surface-soft #fbf7f0 +
brand-deep #f5be63 +
ink-cta-bg #000000 +
ink-cta-text #ffffff +
dark-cta-bg #222222 +
link #0d0d0d +
link-hover #000000 +
selected-bg rgba(255, 209, 132, 0.30) +
disabled #b8b8b8 +
success-text #15803d +
warning-text #92600c +
danger-text #b91c1c +
info-text #0d0d0d −
bg-soft #f6f3ec −
bg-elev #f1ede4 −
surface-2 #f6f3ec −
surface-3 #ebe6db −
brand-hover #28893f −
brand-active #22742f −
accent-warm #fffbf6 −
accent-warm-deep #f3ece0 −
accent-lilac #efeaff −
accent-sky #e6f1fb −
border-focus #2e9e4f −
success #2e9e4f −
warning #d98a00 −
danger #d83a3a −
info #2e9e4f typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Manrope","size":80} → {"family":"telkaExtended","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Manrope","size":54} → {"family":"telkaExtended","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Manrope","size":40} → {"family":"telkaExtended","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Manrope","size":16} → {"family":"telka","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.