Diff

GitLab vs Wispr Flow

55 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #ffffeb
Text
#171321 #1a1a1a
Brand
#fc6d26 #f0d7ff
Border
#171321 #1a1a1a4d
Display font
GitLab Sans EB Garamond
Body size
18px 16px
colors 50 changed
~ bg #ffffff #ffffeb
~ surface #ffffff #034f46
~ surface-soft #f2f1f5 #e4e4d0
~ text #171321 #1a1a1a
~ text-soft #4d4a57 #888888
~ text-muted #6e6b78 #666666
~ on-brand #ffffff #1a1a1a
~ brand #fc6d26 #f0d7ff
~ border #171321 #1a1a1a4d
~ border-soft #dcd9e3 #1a1a1a1a
+ bg-dark #e4e4d0
+ text-darkest #111111
+ on-surface #ffffeb
+ brand-ink #1a1a1a
+ accent-glow #ffa946
+ accent-fathom #034f46
+ accent-pulse #7f1c34
+ border-strong #1a1a1a80
+ white #ffffff
+ shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05)
+ shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10)
+ scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50)
+ success #114e0b
+ success-soft #cef5ca
+ warning #5e5515
+ warning-soft #fcf8d8
+ danger #7f1c34
+ danger-soft #f8e4e4
+ focus-state #2d62ff
bg-soft #f2f1f5
surface-ink #171321
text-strong #171321
text-faint #9b99a3
brand-red #e24329
brand-purple #6e49cb
brand-soft rgba(252, 109, 38, 0.10)
brand-gradient linear-gradient(135deg, #fc6d26 0%, #e24329 50%, #6e49cb 100%)
cta-bg #171321
cta-text #ffffff
cta-hover #2b2640
cta-light-bg #ffffff
cta-light-text #171321
link #6e49cb
link-hover #5a3aa8
border-faint #ece9f1
semantic-success #108548
semantic-warning #c17d10
semantic-danger #dd2b0e
semantic-info #6e49cb
shadow-tint rgba(23, 19, 33, 0.10)
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":96} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120}
~ h1 {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":48} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":40} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36}
~ body {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":18} {"family":"Figtree","size":16}
~ label {"family":"GitLab Mono","size":14} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13}
radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Wispr Flow → GitLab